over 90

search for more blogs here

 

"Replacement Windows Midlands - Toughened Glass Or Laminated?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-11-15 11:12:43

To set the record straight both are forms of safety glass. People often assume that toughened glass is some form of extra strong glass however. ’shatter safely glass’ would be a better description of toughened glass as its difficult to break but not impossible. When it does break it will break into very small sections but will not pose the danger created by large glass shards formed when ordinary float glass breaks. Toughened glass is preferred for use in domestic replacement windows as laminated glass when hit with force will crack but is unlikely to smash. This makes it less desirable if you need to break the window to escape. If security is a major consideration the strength of laminated glass is an advantage. Laminated glass is also thicker - usually 6+ mm - and as such will offer better insulation. At Trustyle UK we belief we have the ideal balance between safety style and quality with the combination of Sculptured VEKA frames and Pilkington K glass with over 90 percent of our customers across the Midlands. Leicestershire. Nottingham and Milton Keynes rating our service as either very good or excellent as per the Consumer Protection Association.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://trustyle-uk.co.uk/blog/replacement-windows-midlands-toughened-glass-or-laminated/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Hendrix Double-Double Leads Alabama Over Mercer, 90-83" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-28 02:47:52

Richard Hendrix had 28 points and 14 rebounds in his second double-double in as many games for Alabama leading the Crimson Tide (2-0. 0-0) over the Mercer Bears (1-1. 0-0) Tuesday night at a sold-out University Center in Macon. Ga. Alabama led by as many as 14 points in the first half taking a 41-33 lead to the break behind Hendrix's 14 first-half points and 11 rebounds. Mercer cut the lead to two points in the second half at 57-55 but Tide sophomore Justin Tubbs hit a three-point shot to give Alabama a 60-55 lead with 11:52 to go. On Alabama's next possession. Hendrix was fouled on a made basket and hit the free throw completing the three-point play and extending the Alabama lead to eight. Alabama never trailed in the second half against the Bears."I'm proud of our guys," Alabama head coach Mark Gottfried said. "There were a lot of good things tonight. We learned a lot including how to play in a tough environment. Four or five days ago this team whipped Southern Cal so our guys had to step up and play." In addition to Hendrix's double-double. Alabama got 11 points from senior Mykal Riley and 16 from junior Alonzo Gee. Tubbs and sophomore Mikhail Torrance each had 9 points as well as freshman Senario Hillman."We played a good game and stepped up the intensity," Hendrix said. "Mercer has a good team. After getting a win on the road against USC we knew we'd have to play well. We did a great job sharing the roll with each other and finding the open man. When I'd kick it out on double and triple teams they'd knock it down."Alabama shot 49 percent in the game making 35 field goals on 26 assists. The Tide turned the ball over just 10 times in the bet with only two turnovers coming in the second half. Torrance and junior Brandon Hollinger each had six assists. "We cut our turnovers down from where they'd been," Gottfried said. "We guarded them pretty well and at key times in the game our guys executed. I thought Richard was a monster. He was great." Alabama returns to Tuscaloosa to host Belmont next Monday. Nov. 19 at 6 p m.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://markgottfried.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=125

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Hendrix Double-Double Leads Alabama Over Mercer, 90-83" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-09-28 02:47:52

Richard Hendrix had 28 points and 14 rebounds in his second double-double in as many games for Alabama leading the Crimson Tide (2-0. 0-0) over the Mercer Bears (1-1. 0-0) Tuesday night at a sold-out University Center in Macon. Ga. Alabama led by as many as 14 points in the first half taking a 41-33 lead to the break behind Hendrix's 14 first-half points and 11 rebounds. Mercer cut the lead to two points in the back up half at 57-55 but Tide sophomore Justin Tubbs hit a three-point shot to give Alabama a 60-55 lead with 11:52 to go. On Alabama's next possession. Hendrix was fouled on a made basket and hit the free throw completing the three-point play and extending the Alabama lead to eight. Alabama never trailed in the second half against the Bears."I'm proud of our guys," Alabama head coach Mark Gottfried said. "There were a lot of good things tonight. We learned a lot including how to play in a tough environment. Four or five days ago this team whipped Southern Cal so our guys had to step up and play." In addition to Hendrix's double-double. Alabama got 11 points from senior Mykal Riley and 16 from junior Alonzo Gee. Tubbs and sophomore Mikhail Torrance each had 9 points as well as freshman Senario Hillman."We played a good game and stepped up the intensity," Hendrix said. "Mercer has a good team. After getting a win on the road against USC we knew we'd have to play well. We did a great job sharing the ball with each other and finding the open man. When I'd kick it out on double and triple teams they'd knock it down."Alabama shot 49 percent in the game making 35 field goals on 26 assists. The Tide turned the ball over just 10 times in the game with only two turnovers coming in the second half. Torrance and junior Brandon Hollinger each had six assists. "We cut our turnovers down from where they'd been," Gottfried said. "We guarded them pretty well and at key times in the game our guys executed. I thought Richard was a monster. He was great." Alabama returns to Tuscaloosa to host Belmont next Monday. Nov. 19 at 6 p m.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://markgottfried.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=125

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Quick Wednesday, Thursday and Friday Numbers" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-06-19 07:08:36

Its been a busy week.  One interesting thing was a well-priced listing we found on the Westside.  It was a prime candidate for our apartment re-habber but being well-priced we expected multiple offers.  As a buyer that means you have to really do your numbers and commit to a firm ceiling price and then take care of all the regular offer logisitics (financing minutes bylaws inspection etc) so that you can go in with few or no subjects.  We offered 6% over list but came in second.   We’ll have to monitor what happens with the sale (and other comps) to see if we were smart to stand pat. (We went through this in North Van as some may recall and soon after the neighbouring property sold for almost exactly what we offered when we lost the multiple perhaps indicating that the buyer had overpaid somewhat). Anyway. Friday we had 170 new listings and 177 sales for a sell/list of 104.12%  Inventory was 10,957 and over 90’s were 2,569 or 23.45%. This market is like a marathoner that starts sprinting just when you think after running for days on straight it should displace dead. Or its like that guy that cracks open a new bottle of Smirnoff at 3am just when you think the celebrate is over. I used to be a real estate salesman and I can tell you late Nov. but especially the first 2 weeks in Dec is the best time of year to buy. Usually those with property up for sale so close to Christmas are desperate to sell. The closer to Christmas the exceed. It is a fact that many speculators realize now they made a big mistake by playing this market and be to get out. The champagne-popping days are over. Despite all the brouhaha about a hot RE market it is clear very little is moving (down 13% from same Q last year) prices are slipping and poised for a major correction or maybe an outright crash. It is quite normal for sellers to stubbornly adjoin to their high prices not wanting to budge but there is a way to make them face free market forces. Usually stink-bidding a property is hard for any individual to do on his own since going face to face with a seller who may be insulted is a situation you might not emotionally be able to handle. This is why you should employ an agent and let him do the work for you. Your agent is obligated to take ALL offers to the vendor. If your agent refuses to cooperate (and most will want to discourage you from this approach) you can remind him a complaint to the BC Real Estate Council might be in request. Be nice about it though and inform your agent it’s your money that’s on the line. And besides what’s so unusual of you being as stubborn (or bone-headed) about price as the seller? This approach is best for people who are just “sitting on the fence” not really needing to get into the market but at this point in the RE cycle it’s good strategy. As the Victorian-era poet Robert Browning said: “A man’s reach must exceed his grasp or what’s a heaven for?” Concerto “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown Park and Spectrum are huge small box developments that will cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that happen ?”Actually I think it is happening a lot of those are listed for rent available immediately. I would imagine most purchasers decided that they would change at peak season (spring) rent until then. How being unable to rent for 4 to 6 months is going to affect their staying power should be interesting. I suspect we’ll see a flod of listings in February as they decide to try to have an early prime season suffering from 100% subsidy thru the winter season. What I see is exactly what I expected a dead winter season with all the new owners expecting to reap a 15% wind fall come spring! Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should give Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they become forever priced out of the merchandise. I would like to know… All I can think of is wet and soggy… leaky and those are old news… Please enlighten us all with your wisdom beyond your years…. BTW if your in your 20’s… you should sit down and comprehend to folks that know better Hi. I rarely post here but am always watching. I undergo a request. I am currently writing an essay on Powell River as a single industry town. I am focussing on its growth as a retirement community. I need figures for the average price of a single family home for each year for the last ten years. I have tried searching but nothing comes up. Could anyone help? Thanks “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown lay and Spectrum are huge small box developments that will cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that happen ?” The Yaletown Park completions were a big topic of the past. The bears claimed this would be the turning point in the market. They were talking about in 2004 and 2005. After all these units completed (close to 800 plus 400 at Hudson) all the negative change flow investors would bail. Or if they tried to rent them out it would flood the rental market and create rents to drop. Either way the market was as good as done according to the bears and this would be the turning point. We heard similar things about Spectrum later on from others. So what happened? Yaletown Park was completed in Spring 2006. We saw very few units come up for sale (about 10%). The units that were for sale were snapped up right away. The units that were rented out were rented for record rents. All the populate who bought at the presales were change flow positive. And as we all know the merchandise continued it’s upward trend. Now we undergo Spectrum completing. Again rents have continued to rise and the Spectrum investors are again cash flow positive. Spectrum IMO is one of the beat DT locations stuck on an island between the viaducts and GM place on top of the only big box store in the core. Still they seem to be getting decent rents for the units. I guess the bears will have to pick a new big project or event to focus on as the “turning point”. Lets pick a new one just for fun now the whole credit crunch thing seems to have gone by the wayside. A quick check on Craigslist shows many Spectrum assignments for sale with 563′ one bedrooms for sale at $379,000. Craigslist also shows many of these same units offered for contract at $1,250 per month. Let’s assume a conservative investor with 25% down and a 25 year mortgage at 5.75%. Mortgage payments alone are $1,776 per month with little of that going to principal in the first couple of years. Add taxes and strata fees (we’ll forget maintenance seeing as its new) and you’re well over $2,200 per month. If you re-read what was said above it mentioned the populate that bought at Spectrum will be cash-flow positive not the ones that are buying now. That condo you listed at $379,000 was probably bought for $225,000 when 1st offered or there abouts at the current rent of $1250/month which seems low it is not cash-flow negative. With rents going up a conservative 3% a year within a couple of years that investment ordain be paying a healthy divendend. First will current selling prices at $379,000 an original purchase price of $225,000 would be 68.44% appreciation. Nothing’s impossible I suppose but this seems more than a bit of a stretch. Even if we assume a $225,000 purchase determine however the owe payment using the same parameters in my original post would be $1,054 per month. Add strata fees and taxes and you are still not cash flow positive at $1,250 per month in rent. The rent may seem low but that is what several investors are asking today; ergo its the current market. “Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should give Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they become forever priced out of the market” no need to be afraid of being priced out of the market because the RE chihuahua dogs are already well planned in the market; thank you for your concern by the way. How about you? still feeling lonely and sour of the market? Better to make that “spycho” counselling very soon!Just a prediction on Nov: The second best on Record! “How being unable to rent for 4 to 6 months is going to affect their staying power should be interesting.” Some people rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that will purport to rent furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t experience how successful they are. On that note there are lots of amateur landlords out there so don’t be surprised if they make all the usual (and unusual) mistakes that the pros know how to forbid. Even if the market stays strong there will be investors that will get burned. I think there will be more of these cases around in the next few years than before. I guessed at the $225K evaluate as I don’t know what the 1bds went for. I do know the 2brs at Specturm were offered at $299K hence the guess at $225 shouldn’t be too far off. Also the comment at onlt 15 lights being on for all the towers most of them haven’t been issued their occupancy permits yet. Again just playing devils advocate here. Jesse;”Some people rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that will purport to contract furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t experience how successful they are.” Most if not all of the ones I see at Spectrum are asking for a 1 year lease with an option for a 6 month contract. Owner know one month vacancy is 10% less rent for the year. Spectrum doesn’t appear to be in the furnished hotel room syndrome. However a great site to see those kind of rentals is which I have watched for the past three months. In that time out of 2000 listings for downtown they are now at 25% vacancy from no vacancy in August. Absolutely nothing has moved. There incredibly high rents appear to have to pay the entire go for the owner in the summer four months. If you work the math these are also losing for their investors. (Multiply the rent x 12 and 1/3 of that is the annual return)! As a side note Spectrum 3 and 4 are just starting move ins this week so look at the lights in December for a better idea. I’d probably look at Jan-Feb for the “lights on” test as one light lit is another extinguished — there is typically overlap especially with initial occupancy where the occupancy date can slip and one needs to keep renting until the move-in date is guaranteed. “flipper city! low end kitchens godawful hall carpets only 2 elevators per bldg.” Agreed I was thru 3 and 4 a while back on business. Basically low end spec quality lousy location. Try two treadmills for 900+ residents! Two elevators means one as with the number of suites one will all ways be tied up moving furniture. Hallway layout means if the act is on your floor you might not be able to get out. adjust price should be around $125,000.00 for a 1 bedroom which is what it will be in two years! British Columbia’s economy created over 55,800 new jobs in the past 12 months to October 2007. Of those. 48,600 or 87% were full-time. Sustained strong growth of employment has also contributed to a steady net influx of people from other provinces and from outside the country. At 4.4%. British Columbia’s unemployment rate is near the 20-year-low it reached in March 2007. Brian this is not news this is industry propaganda. Consider the website a construction company backed by RE industry quotes. “Finally despite the weakness in the U. S.. China’s insatiable appetite for British Columbia’s resources should mean that the province’s net exports will continue to contribute to growth in the future.” This is end rubbish. China does not have an ‘insatiable appetite’ for BC exports. Reed construction could not have possibly verified this. As I posted last week. BC only exports what was it. 4.5% to China. I think it was $1.5 billion. Further it mentions 13 000 jobs created in construction out of 55 000 jobs over the last year were in construction alone. If this is correct almost a quarter of all new jobs are in construction. Sounds desire California a couple of years ago. A lot of Canadian banks have taken some write-off with regards to their subprime exposure. But if you check their stock prices they are no where near their 52 week low quite unlike their cousins in the US. Bank of montreal trades up today. FYI. That speaks truth about the amount of subprime exposure for the canadian banks and also explains the continued boom in the canadian real estate market. “Economic uncertainty in the U. S spurred by the housing recession and tightening credit markets has perhaps knocked the American who would spend $500,000. Kelly said. Americans playing in the $1-million-plus market are still interested in Whistler but proceeding with a bit more compassionate he added. “They definitely have to have something before the Olympics whether it’s rental or purchase,” Kelly said. “Americans are big Olympic boosters they always have been and they want to be part of [the 2010 Games].” ” Yes. Americans are big Olympic boosters. But how many are going to buy just because of the Olympics. These $1 Million plus players didn’t get rich buying on hype. I remember lots of people saying Americans were buying places en masse a couple of years ago. I had quoted Landcor indicating this was not true but not everyone was convinced … it still appears they were not majors movers ever during this boom. Landcor didn’t change surface mentioned non-resident Iranians and Chinese since there purchases in BC were not significant. Lots of others thought there was proxy buying and that their purchasing was/is rampant. Maybe if one had lots of exposure to one market like burn Harbour this might seem true but I dont’ know since there is no data showing this. TORONTO. March 2 (Reuters) - Royal Bank of Canada (RY. TO: Quote. compose. Research) posted a 27.6 percent rise in its first-quarter profit on Friday as a result of strong earnings across all of its business divisions particularly in its U. S segment. Canada’s biggest tip said it earned C$1.49 billion or C$1.14 a share for the three months ending Jan. 31. VANCOUVER. British Columbia (Reuters) - Bank of Nova Scotia became the latest Canadian bank on Tuesday to warn of writedowns in its fourth-quarter results because of turmoil in the U. S subprime mortgage market. Scotiabank. Canada’s second-biggest bank said it will lop C$135 million ($141 million) after tax off the value of its nonbank asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) and structured credit investments. The administer of Canada’s ABCP market that is not run by the country’s big banks ground to a stop this summer when buyers dried up on fears the debt investments were exposed to the U. S subprime market. Companies holding the paper as investments have been cutting up to 15 percent off its value. Scotiabank’s announcement came several hours after Royal Bank of Canada said it will take a C$160-million after-tax charge in the same quarter for investments tied to the subprime market where some analysts expect at least one in every four risky home loans could go into default. We probably haven’t seen the full extent of the write-downs but if my math is alter (someone please check it) RB made a Q1 profit about 9 times bigger than the create verbally down. Does that make the write-down big or small? I’ll let you decide and add only that I wouldn’t call the write down insignificant and smaller losses in one area of a profitable balance sheet have probably hammered other stock values even more. Aside from it looking scary and moving fast (sorry. Priced Out but what’s new about that?) can anyone hammer some numbers into perspective? (Side note: I read today a forecast for 4 rate cuts from BoC. Remember what I said about the CBs thinking they can manage inflation coco? I know time will tell but I see increasing liquidity on the horizon). If banks could manage subprime writedowns why would they raise mortgage rates in October due to the credit crunch and offer less off a discount off the posted mortgage rates more recently? I guess they want to maintain high profits and please the shareholders after all? The consumer will pay for banks bad investments whether that is in the form of higher credit card interest rates higher owe rates less of a discount off posted mortgage rates higher bank fees borrowing restrictions etc. etc. That said are you really seeing significant moves in mortgage rates? My latest rate sheet has everything from 1-5 years in a narrow band: 5.55% to 5.94%. Compare that to Feb this year:1 yr = 5.2%2 yr = 5.25%3 yr = 5.3%4 yr = 5.3%5 yr = 5.19% and September of ‘06:1 yr = 5.1% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.25% August 23rd)2 yr = 5.2% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)3 yr = 5.3% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)4 yr = 5.35% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.4% August 23rd)5 yr = 5.28% (was 5.3% September 14 and 5.35% August 23rd) Can’t find it online at the FP but in the paper itself. FP2. Best of the FP Netwoork you’ll find Ted Carmicheal. JP Morgan Chase Canada’s chief economist making the call. You guessed it: he is styled one of the most bearish forecasters on Bay Street. He thinks 4 cuts of 25 basis points apiece will not sell attempts to keep core inflation in the 2% range. In other news PMI Mortgage Insurance was approved Thursday for the lucrative insured mortgage arena. CMHC a enthrone corporation has long dominated the sector with about 70% market share. They’ve been giving up ground (not too hard to do when you start from a monopoly position and then have to compete) to Genworth and AIG. Another player makes for more competition and that gives Canadians who require mortgage insurance more choice which is a good thing. While it reduces CMHC’s access toe asy money it should also calm those who fear that the Canadian taxpayer is underwriting bad loans through CMHC. Who can really argue against privatizing bad loans? XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote have in mind=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://rireb.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/quick-wednesday-thursday-and-friday-numbers/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Quick Wednesday, Thursday and Friday Numbers" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-06-19 07:08:25

Its been a busy week.  One interesting thing was a well-priced listing we found on the Westside.  It was a prime candidate for our apartment re-habber but being well-priced we expected multiple offers.  As a buyer that means you have to really do your numbers and commit to a firm ceiling price and then take compassionate of all the regular furnish logisitics (financing minutes bylaws inspection etc) so that you can go in with few or no subjects.  We offered 6% over list but came in second.   We’ll have to monitor what happens with the sale (and other comps) to see if we were smart to stand pat. (We went through this in North Van as some may recall and soon after the neighbouring property sold for almost exactly what we offered when we lost the multiple perhaps indicating that the buyer had overpaid somewhat). Anyway. Friday we had 170 new listings and 177 sales for a sell/list of 104.12%  Inventory was 10,957 and over 90’s were 2,569 or 23.45%. This market is desire a marathoner that starts sprinting just when you think after running for days on straight it should drop dead. Or its like that guy that cracks open a new store of Smirnoff at 3am just when you think the party is over. I used to be a real estate salesman and I can tell you late Nov. but especially the first 2 weeks in Dec is the best time of year to buy. Usually those with property up for sale so close to Christmas are desperate to sell. The closer to Christmas the better. It is a fact that many speculators realize now they made a big mistake by playing this market and want to get out. The champagne-popping days are over. Despite all the brouhaha about a hot RE market it is clear very little is moving (down 13% from same Q last year) prices are slipping and poised for a major correction or maybe an outright crash. It is quite normal for sellers to stubbornly cling to their high prices not wanting to budge but there is a way to make them approach free market forces. Usually stink-bidding a property is hard for any individual to do on his own since going face to face with a seller who may be insulted is a situation you might not emotionally be able to handle. This is why you should employ an agent and let him do the work for you. Your agent is obligated to take ALL offers to the vendor. If your agent refuses to cooperate (and most ordain want to discourage you from this approach) you can remind him a complaint to the BC Real Estate Council might be in order. Be nice about it though and remind your agent it’s your money that’s on the line. And besides what’s so unusual of you being as stubborn (or bone-headed) about price as the seller? This approach is best for people who are just “sitting on the fence” not really needing to get into the market but at this point in the RE cycle it’s good strategy. As the Victorian-era poet Robert Browning said: “A man’s reach must exceed his grasp or what’s a heaven for?” Concerto “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown Park and Spectrum are huge small box developments that will cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that come about ?”Actually I think it is happening a lot of those are listed for rent available immediately. I would imagine most purchasers decided that they would sell at peak season (spring) rent until then. How being unable to rent for 4 to 6 months is going to affect their staying power should be interesting. I guess we’ll see a flod of listings in February as they decide to try to have an early prime season suffering from 100% subsidy thru the winter season. What I see is exactly what I expected a dead winter season with all the new owners expecting to reap a 15% wind fall come spring! Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should give Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they become forever priced out of the market. I would like to know… All I can think of is wet and soggy… leaky and those are old news… Please enlighten us all with your wisdom beyond your years…. BTW if your in your 20’s… you should sit down and listen to folks that know better Hi. I rarely post here but am always watching. I have a request. I am currently writing an essay on Powell River as a single industry town. I am focussing on its growth as a retirement community. I need figures for the average determine of a single family home for each year for the last ten years. I undergo tried searching but nothing comes up. Could anyone help? Thanks “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown Park and Spectrum are huge small box developments that will cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that happen ?” The Yaletown Park completions were a big topic of the past. The bears claimed this would be the turning point in the market. They were talking about in 2004 and 2005. After all these units completed (close to 800 plus 400 at Hudson) all the negative cash flow investors would bail. Or if they tried to rent them out it would fill the rental market and cause rents to displace. Either way the market was as good as done according to the bears and this would be the turning point. We heard similar things about Spectrum later on from others. So what happened? Yaletown Park was completed in Spring 2006. We saw very few units come up for sale (about 10%). The units that were for sale were snapped up right away. The units that were rented out were rented for record rents. All the people who bought at the presales were cash flow positive. And as we all experience the market continued it’s upward trend. Now we have Spectrum completing. Again rents have continued to rise and the Spectrum investors are again cash flow positive. Spectrum IMO is one of the worst DT locations stuck on an island between the viaducts and GM place on top of the only big box store in the core. Still they be to be getting decent rents for the units. I guess the bears will have to pick a new big project or event to focus on as the “turning point”. Lets pick a new one just for fun now the whole credit crunch thing seems to have gone by the wayside. A quick check on Craigslist shows many Spectrum assignments for sale with 563′ one bedrooms for sale at $379,000. Craigslist also shows many of these same units offered for rent at $1,250 per month. Let’s assume a conservative investor with 25% down and a 25 year mortgage at 5.75%. Mortgage payments alone are $1,776 per month with little of that going to principal in the first couple of years. Add taxes and strata fees (we’ll forget maintenance seeing as its new) and you’re come up over $2,200 per month. If you re-read what was said above it mentioned the people that bought at Spectrum will be cash-flow positive not the ones that are buying now. That condo you listed at $379,000 was probably bought for $225,000 when 1st offered or there abouts at the current rent of $1250/month which seems low it is not cash-flow negative. With rents going up a conservative 3% a year within a couple of years that investment will be paying a healthy divendend. First will current selling prices at $379,000 an original purchase price of $225,000 would be 68.44% appreciation. Nothing’s impossible I suppose but this seems more than a bit of a stretch. Even if we assume a $225,000 purchase price however the mortgage payment using the same parameters in my original post would be $1,054 per month. Add strata fees and taxes and you are still not cash flow positive at $1,250 per month in rent. The rent may seem low but that is what several investors are asking today; ergo its the current market. “Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should give Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they become forever priced out of the market” no need to be afraid of being priced out of the market because the RE chihuahua dogs are already well planned in the market; thank you for your concern by the way. How about you? still feeling lonely and change state of the market? Better to make that “spycho” counselling very soon!Just a prediction on Nov: The back up best on Record! “How being unable to rent for 4 to 6 months is going to affect their staying power should be interesting.” Some people rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that ordain purport to rent furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t know how successful they are. On that note there are lots of amateur landlords out there so don’t be surprised if they make all the usual (and unusual) mistakes that the pros experience how to avoid. Even if the market stays strong there will be investors that will get burned. I think there will be more of these cases around in the next few years than before. I guessed at the $225K figure as I don’t experience what the 1bds went for. I do know the 2brs at Specturm were offered at $299K hence the guess at $225 shouldn’t be too far off. Also the comment at onlt 15 lights being on for all the towers most of them haven’t been issued their occupancy permits yet. Again just playing devils advocate here. Jesse;”Some people rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that will purport to rent furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t know how successful they are.” Most if not all of the ones I see at Spectrum are asking for a 1 year lease with an option for a 6 month lease. Owner know one month vacancy is 10% less rent for the year. Spectrum doesn’t appear to be in the furnished hotel room syndrome. However a great place to see those kind of rentals is which I undergo watched for the past three months. In that time out of 2000 listings for downtown they are now at 25% vacancy from no vacancy in August. Absolutely nothing has moved. There incredibly high rents be to have to pay the entire return for the owner in the summer four months. If you bring home the bacon the math these are also losing for their investors. (Multiply the contract x 12 and 1/3 of that is the annual return)! As a side note Spectrum 3 and 4 are just starting move ins this week so be at the lights in December for a better idea. I’d probably look at Jan-Feb for the “lights on” test as one light lit is another extinguished — there is typically overlap especially with initial occupancy where the occupancy date can move and one needs to keep renting until the move-in date is guaranteed. “flipper city! low end kitchens godawful hall carpets only 2 elevators per bldg.” Agreed I was thru 3 and 4 a while approve on business. Basically low end spec quality lousy location. Try two treadmills for 900+ residents! Two elevators means one as with the number of suites one will all ways be tied up moving furniture. Hallway layout means if the move is on your floor you might not be able to get out. True price should be around $125,000.00 for a 1 bedroom which is what it will be in two years! British Columbia’s economy created over 55,800 new jobs in the past 12 months to October 2007. Of those. 48,600 or 87% were full-time. Sustained strong growth of employment has also contributed to a stabilise net influx of people from other provinces and from outside the country. At 4.4%. British Columbia’s unemployment rate is near the 20-year-low it reached in March 2007. Brian this is not news this is industry propaganda. Consider the website a construction company backed by RE industry quotes. “Finally despite the weakness in the U. S.. China’s insatiable appetite for British Columbia’s resources should mean that the province’s net exports will continue to contribute to growth in the future.” This is complete rubbish. China does not have an ‘insatiable appetite’ for BC exports. Reed construction could not have possibly verified this. As I posted last week. BC only exports what was it. 4.5% to China. I think it was $1.5 billion. Further it mentions 13 000 jobs created in construction out of 55 000 jobs over the last year were in construction alone. If this is correct almost a accommodate of all new jobs are in construction. Sounds like California a couple of years ago. A lot of Canadian banks have taken some write-off with regards to their subprime exposure. But if you check their stock prices they are no where near their 52 week low quite unlike their cousins in the US. Bank of montreal trades up today. FYI. That speaks truth about the amount of subprime exposure for the canadian banks and also explains the continued boom in the canadian real estate merchandise. “Economic uncertainty in the U. S spurred by the housing recession and tightening credit markets has perhaps knocked the American who would pay $500,000. Kelly said. Americans playing in the $1-million-plus market are still interested in Whistler but proceeding with a bit more care he added. “They definitely undergo to have something before the Olympics whether it’s rental or purchase,” Kelly said. “Americans are big Olympic boosters they always have been and they want to be part of [the 2010 Games].” ” Yes. Americans are big Olympic boosters. But how many are going to buy just because of the Olympics. These $1 Million plus players didn’t get rich buying on hype. I remember lots of people saying Americans were buying places en masse a couple of years ago. I had quoted Landcor indicating this was not true but not everyone was convinced … it still appears they were not majors movers ever during this boom. Landcor didn’t even mentioned non-resident Iranians and Chinese since there purchases in BC were not significant. Lots of others thought there was proxy buying and that their purchasing was/is rampant. Maybe if one had lots of exposure to one market like Coal shelter this might seem adjust but I dont’ experience since there is no data showing this. TORONTO. March 2 (Reuters) - Royal Bank of Canada (RY. TO: Quote. Profile. Research) posted a 27.6 percent rise in its first-quarter profit on Friday as a result of strong earnings across all of its business divisions particularly in its U. S segment. Canada’s biggest bank said it earned C$1.49 billion or C$1.14 a share for the three months ending Jan. 31. VANCOUVER. British Columbia (Reuters) - tip of Nova Scotia became the latest Canadian bank on Tuesday to warn of writedowns in its fourth-quarter results because of turmoil in the U. S subprime mortgage market. Scotiabank. Canada’s second-biggest bank said it will lop C$135 million ($141 million) after tax off the value of its nonbank asset-backed commercial cover (ABCP) and structured credit investments. The portion of Canada’s ABCP market that is not run by the country’s big banks ground to a halt this pass when buyers dried up on fears the debt investments were exposed to the U. S subprime market. Companies holding the paper as investments have been cutting up to 15 percent off its value. Scotiabank’s announcement came several hours after Royal Bank of Canada said it will act a C$160-million after-tax charge in the same quarter for investments tied to the subprime market where some analysts expect at least one in every four risky home loans could go into default. We probably haven’t seen the full extent of the write-downs but if my math is right (someone please check it) RB made a Q1 profit about 9 times bigger than the write down. Does that make the write-down big or small? I’ll let you decide and add only that I wouldn’t call the write down insignificant and smaller losses in one area of a profitable balance sheet have probably hammered other have values even more. Aside from it looking scary and moving fast (sorry. Priced Out but what’s new about that?) can anyone hammer some numbers into perspective? (Side note: I read today a forecast for 4 rate cuts from BoC. Remember what I said about the CBs thinking they can manage inflation coco? I experience time ordain tell but I see increasing liquidity on the horizon). If banks could manage subprime writedowns why would they raise mortgage rates in October due to the credit crunch and offer less off a discount off the posted mortgage rates more recently? I guess they want to maintain high profits and gratify the shareholders after all? The consumer will pay for banks bad investments whether that is in the form of higher credit separate interest rates higher mortgage rates less of a discount off posted mortgage rates higher bank fees borrowing restrictions etc. etc. That said are you really seeing significant moves in mortgage rates? My latest rate sheet has everything from 1-5 years in a change band: 5.55% to 5.94%. Compare that to Feb this year:1 yr = 5.2%2 yr = 5.25%3 yr = 5.3%4 yr = 5.3%5 yr = 5.19% and September of ‘06:1 yr = 5.1% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.25% August 23rd)2 yr = 5.2% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)3 yr = 5.3% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)4 yr = 5.35% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.4% August 23rd)5 yr = 5.28% (was 5.3% September 14 and 5.35% August 23rd) Can’t find it online at the FP but in the paper itself. FP2. Best of the FP Netwoork you’ll find Ted Carmicheal. JP Morgan Chase Canada’s chief economist making the call. You guessed it: he is styled one of the most bearish forecasters on Bay Street. He thinks 4 cuts of 25 basis points apiece will not undercut attempts to keep core inflation in the 2% range. In other news PMI Mortgage Insurance was approved Thursday for the lucrative insured mortgage arena. CMHC a crown corporation has long dominated the sector with about 70% market share. They’ve been giving up ground (not too hard to do when you start from a monopoly position and then have to compete) to Genworth and AIG. Another player makes for more competition and that gives Canadians who require mortgage insurance more choice which is a good thing. While it reduces CMHC’s access toe asy money it should also calm those who fear that the Canadian taxpayer is underwriting bad loans through CMHC. Who can really lay out against privatizing bad loans? XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://rireb.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/quick-wednesday-thursday-and-friday-numbers/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Quick Wednesday, Thursday and Friday Numbers" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-06-19 07:08:25

Its been a busy week.  One interesting thing was a well-priced listing we open on the Westside.  It was a prime candidate for our apartment re-habber but being well-priced we expected multiple offers.  As a buyer that means you have to really do your numbers and commit to a firm ceiling price and then take care of all the regular offer logisitics (financing minutes bylaws inspection etc) so that you can go in with few or no subjects.  We offered 6% over list but came in back up.   We’ll undergo to monitor what happens with the sale (and other comps) to see if we were cause to be perceived to stand pat. (We went through this in North Van as some may recall and soon after the neighbouring property sold for almost exactly what we offered when we lost the multiple perhaps indicating that the buyer had overpaid somewhat). Anyway. Friday we had 170 new listings and 177 sales for a sell/list of 104.12%  Inventory was 10,957 and over 90’s were 2,569 or 23.45%. This market is like a marathoner that starts sprinting just when you think after running for days on straight it should drop dead. Or its like that guy that cracks open a new bottle of Smirnoff at 3am just when you think the party is over. I used to be a real estate salesman and I can tell you late Nov. but especially the first 2 weeks in Dec is the best time of year to buy. Usually those with property up for sale so close to Christmas are desperate to sell. The closer to Christmas the better. It is a fact that many speculators realize now they made a big mistake by playing this market and want to get out. The champagne-popping days are over. Despite all the brouhaha about a hot RE market it is clear very little is moving (down 13% from same Q measure year) prices are slipping and poised for a major correction or maybe an outright crash. It is quite normal for sellers to stubbornly cling to their high prices not wanting to move but there is a way to make them face free market forces. Usually stink-bidding a property is hard for any individual to do on his own since going face to face with a seller who may be insulted is a situation you might not emotionally be able to handle. This is why you should employ an agent and let him do the work for you. Your agent is obligated to take ALL offers to the vendor. If your agent refuses to cooperate (and most will want to discourage you from this approach) you can remind him a complaint to the BC Real Estate Council might be in order. Be nice about it though and remind your agent it’s your money that’s on the line. And besides what’s so unusual of you being as stubborn (or bone-headed) about price as the seller? This approach is beat for people who are just “sitting on the fence” not really needing to get into the market but at this point in the RE cycle it’s good strategy. As the Victorian-era poet Robert Browning said: “A man’s reach must exceed his grasp or what’s a heaven for?” Concerto “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown Park and Spectrum are huge small box developments that ordain cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that happen ?”Actually I think it is happening a lot of those are listed for rent available immediately. I would imagine most purchasers decided that they would sell at peak toughen (spring) contract until then. How being unable to contract for 4 to 6 months is going to affect their staying power should be interesting. I suspect we’ll see a flod of listings in February as they decide to try to have an early prime toughen suffering from 100% subsidy thru the winter toughen. What I see is exactly what I expected a dead winter season with all the new owners expecting to reap a 15% wind fall come spring! Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should furnish Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they change state forever priced out of the market. I would like to know… All I can think of is wet and soggy… leaky and those are old news… Please enlighten us all with your wisdom beyond your years…. BTW if your in your 20’s… you should sit down and listen to folks that know exceed Hi. I rarely post here but am always watching. I have a request. I am currently writing an essay on Powell River as a single industry town. I am focussing on its growth as a retirement community. I need figures for the average price of a single family home for each year for the last ten years. I have tried searching but nothing comes up. Could anyone help? Thanks “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown Park and Spectrum are huge small box developments that will cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that come about ?” The Yaletown Park completions were a big topic of the past. The bears claimed this would be the turning point in the merchandise. They were talking about in 2004 and 2005. After all these units completed (close to 800 plus 400 at Hudson) all the negative cash flow investors would bail. Or if they tried to rent them out it would flood the rental market and create rents to drop. Either way the market was as good as done according to the bears and this would be the turning point. We heard similar things about Spectrum later on from others. So what happened? Yaletown Park was completed in move 2006. We saw very few units come up for sale (about 10%). The units that were for sale were snapped up right away. The units that were rented out were rented for preserve rents. All the people who bought at the presales were cash flow positive. And as we all know the market continued it’s upward trend. Now we have Spectrum completing. Again rents undergo continued to rise and the Spectrum investors are again change flow positive. Spectrum IMO is one of the worst DT locations stuck on an island between the viaducts and GM place on top of the only big box store in the core. Still they seem to be getting decent rents for the units. I guess the bears will have to pick a new big project or event to focus on as the “turning point”. Lets pick a new one just for fun now the whole credit crunch thing seems to have gone by the wayside. A quick analyse on Craigslist shows many Spectrum assignments for sale with 563′ one bedrooms for sale at $379,000. Craigslist also shows many of these same units offered for contract at $1,250 per month. Let’s assume a conservative investor with 25% down and a 25 year mortgage at 5.75%. Mortgage payments alone are $1,776 per month with little of that going to principal in the first bring together of years. Add taxes and strata fees (we’ll forget maintenance seeing as its new) and you’re well over $2,200 per month. If you re-read what was said above it mentioned the people that bought at Spectrum will be cash-flow positive not the ones that are buying now. That condo you listed at $379,000 was probably bought for $225,000 when 1st offered or there abouts at the current rent of $1250/month which seems low it is not cash-flow negative. With rents going up a conservative 3% a year within a couple of years that investment ordain be paying a healthy divendend. First will current selling prices at $379,000 an original purchase price of $225,000 would be 68.44% appreciation. Nothing’s impossible I suppose but this seems more than a bit of a stretch. Even if we assume a $225,000 purchase price however the mortgage payment using the same parameters in my original post would be $1,054 per month. Add strata fees and taxes and you are comfort not cash flow positive at $1,250 per month in rent. The rent may seem low but that is what several investors are asking today; ergo its the current market. “Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should give Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they become forever priced out of the market” no be to be afraid of being priced out of the market because the RE chihuahua dogs are already well planned in the market; thank you for your concern by the way. How about you? still feeling lonely and sour of the market? exceed to make that “spycho” counselling very soon!Just a prediction on Nov: The second best on Record! “How being unable to rent for 4 to 6 months is going to affect their staying power should be interesting.” Some people rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that will purport to rent furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t know how successful they are. On that note there are lots of amateur landlords out there so don’t be surprised if they make all the usual (and unusual) mistakes that the pros know how to avoid. change surface if the merchandise stays strong there will be investors that will get burned. I think there will be more of these cases around in the next few years than before. I guessed at the $225K figure as I don’t know what the 1bds went for. I do know the 2brs at Specturm were offered at $299K hence the anticipate at $225 shouldn’t be too far off. Also the comment at onlt 15 lights being on for all the towers most of them haven’t been issued their occupancy permits yet. Again just playing devils advocate here. Jesse;”Some people rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that will purport to contract furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t know how successful they are.” Most if not all of the ones I see at Spectrum are asking for a 1 year lease with an option for a 6 month lease. Owner know one month vacancy is 10% less rent for the year. Spectrum doesn’t appear to be in the furnished hotel room syndrome. However a great place to see those kind of rentals is which I have watched for the past three months. In that time out of 2000 listings for downtown they are now at 25% vacancy from no vacancy in August. Absolutely nothing has moved. There incredibly high rents appear to have to pay the entire go for the owner in the summer four months. If you work the math these are also losing for their investors. (Multiply the rent x 12 and 1/3 of that is the annual return)! As a side note Spectrum 3 and 4 are just starting move ins this week so look at the lights in December for a better idea. I’d probably look at Jan-Feb for the “lights on” test as one light lit is another extinguished — there is typically overlap especially with initial occupancy where the occupancy date can slip and one needs to keep renting until the move-in date is guaranteed. “flipper city! low end kitchens godawful hall carpets only 2 elevators per bldg.” Agreed I was thru 3 and 4 a while back on business. Basically low end spec quality lousy location. Try two treadmills for 900+ residents! Two elevators means one as with the number of suites one will all ways be tied up moving furniture. Hallway layout means if the move is on your floor you might not be able to get out. True price should be around $125,000.00 for a 1 bedroom which is what it will be in two years! British Columbia’s economy created over 55,800 new jobs in the past 12 months to October 2007. Of those. 48,600 or 87% were full-time. Sustained strong growth of employment has also contributed to a steady net influx of people from other provinces and from outside the country. At 4.4%. British Columbia’s unemployment rate is near the 20-year-low it reached in March 2007. Brian this is not news this is industry propaganda. Consider the website a construction company backed by RE industry quotes. “Finally despite the weakness in the U. S.. China’s insatiable appetite for British Columbia’s resources should mean that the province’s net exports will continue to alter to growth in the future.” This is complete rubbish. China does not have an ‘insatiable appetite’ for BC exports. Reed construction could not have possibly verified this. As I posted last week. BC only exports what was it. 4.5% to China. I think it was $1.5 billion. advance it mentions 13 000 jobs created in construction out of 55 000 jobs over the last year were in construction alone. If this is correct almost a quarter of all new jobs are in construction. Sounds desire California a couple of years ago. A lot of Canadian banks undergo taken some write-off with regards to their subprime exposure. But if you check their stock prices they are no where near their 52 week low quite unlike their cousins in the US. Bank of montreal trades up today. FYI. That speaks truth about the amount of subprime exposure for the canadian banks and also explains the continued boom in the canadian real estate market. “Economic uncertainty in the U. S spurred by the housing recession and tightening credit markets has perhaps knocked the American who would spend $500,000. Kelly said. Americans playing in the $1-million-plus merchandise are still interested in Whistler but proceeding with a bit more care he added. “They definitely have to have something before the Olympics whether it’s rental or purchase,” Kelly said. “Americans are big Olympic boosters they always have been and they want to be part of [the 2010 Games].” ” Yes. Americans are big Olympic boosters. But how many are going to buy just because of the Olympics. These $1 Million plus players didn’t get rich buying on hype. I remember lots of populate saying Americans were buying places en masse a couple of years ago. I had quoted Landcor indicating this was not true but not everyone was convinced … it still appears they were not majors movers ever during this boom. Landcor didn’t even mentioned non-resident Iranians and Chinese since there purchases in BC were not significant. Lots of others thought there was proxy buying and that their purchasing was/is rampant. Maybe if one had lots of exposure to one market like Coal Harbour this might be true but I dont’ know since there is no data showing this. TORONTO. March 2 (Reuters) - Royal Bank of Canada (RY. TO: Quote. Profile. Research) posted a 27.6 percent rise in its first-quarter profit on Friday as a prove of strong earnings across all of its business divisions particularly in its U. S segment. Canada’s biggest bank said it earned C$1.49 billion or C$1.14 a share for the three months ending Jan. 31. VANCOUVER. British Columbia (Reuters) - Bank of Nova Scotia became the latest Canadian bank on Tuesday to warn of writedowns in its fourth-quarter results because of turmoil in the U. S subprime mortgage market. Scotiabank. Canada’s second-biggest bank said it will lop C$135 million ($141 million) after tax off the value of its nonbank asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) and structured credit investments. The portion of Canada’s ABCP market that is not run by the country’s big banks ground to a halt this summer when buyers dried up on fears the debt investments were exposed to the U. S subprime market. Companies holding the paper as investments have been cutting up to 15 percent off its value. Scotiabank’s announcement came several hours after Royal Bank of Canada said it will take a C$160-million after-tax charge in the same quarter for investments tied to the subprime market where some analysts expect at least one in every four risky home loans could go into default. We probably haven’t seen the full extent of the write-downs but if my math is right (someone please check it) RB made a Q1 profit about 9 times bigger than the create verbally drink. Does that make the write-down big or small? I’ll let you decide and add only that I wouldn’t label the write down insignificant and smaller losses in one area of a profitable balance sheet undergo probably hammered other stock values even more. Aside from it looking scary and moving fast (sorry. Priced Out but what’s new about that?) can anyone hammer some numbers into perspective? (Side say: I read today a forecast for 4 rate cuts from BoC. Remember what I said about the CBs thinking they can bring home the bacon inflation coco? I know time will tell but I see increasing liquidity on the horizon). If banks could manage subprime writedowns why would they increase mortgage rates in October due to the credit crunch and offer less off a discount off the posted mortgage rates more recently? I guess they want to maintain high profits and please the shareholders after all? The consumer will pay for banks bad investments whether that is in the form of higher credit card interest rates higher owe rates less of a discount off posted mortgage rates higher bank fees borrowing restrictions etc. etc. That said are you really seeing significant moves in mortgage rates? My latest rate sheet has everything from 1-5 years in a narrow band: 5.55% to 5.94%. analyse that to Feb this year:1 yr = 5.2%2 yr = 5.25%3 yr = 5.3%4 yr = 5.3%5 yr = 5.19% and September of ‘06:1 yr = 5.1% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.25% August 23rd)2 yr = 5.2% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)3 yr = 5.3% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)4 yr = 5.35% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.4% August 23rd)5 yr = 5.28% (was 5.3% September 14 and 5.35% August 23rd) Can’t find it online at the FP but in the paper itself. FP2. Best of the FP Netwoork you’ll find Ted Carmicheal. JP Morgan Chase Canada’s chief economist making the label. You guessed it: he is styled one of the most bearish forecasters on Bay Street. He thinks 4 cuts of 25 basis points apiece will not undercut attempts to act core inflation in the 2% range. In other news PMI owe Insurance was approved Thursday for the lucrative insured mortgage arena. CMHC a crown corporation has long dominated the sector with about 70% market share. They’ve been giving up ground (not too hard to do when you go away from a monopoly position and then have to compete) to Genworth and AIG. Another player makes for more competition and that gives Canadians who demand mortgage insurance more choice which is a good thing. While it reduces CMHC’s access toe asy money it should also calm those who fear that the Canadian taxpayer is underwriting bad loans through CMHC. Who can really argue against privatizing bad loans? XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q have in mind=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://rireb.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/quick-wednesday-thursday-and-friday-numbers/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Quick Wednesday, Thursday and Friday Numbers" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-06-19 07:08:15

Its been a busy week.  One interesting thing was a well-priced listing we found on the Westside.  It was a prime candidate for our apartment re-habber but being well-priced we expected multiple offers.  As a buyer that means you undergo to really do your numbers and commit to a firm ceiling price and then take care of all the regular offer logisitics (financing minutes bylaws inspection etc) so that you can go in with few or no subjects.  We offered 6% over list but came in back up.   We’ll have to observe what happens with the sale (and other comps) to see if we were smart to stand pat. (We went through this in North Van as some may recall and soon after the neighbouring property sold for almost exactly what we offered when we lost the multiple perhaps indicating that the buyer had overpaid somewhat). Anyway. Friday we had 170 new listings and 177 sales for a sell/list of 104.12%  Inventory was 10,957 and over 90’s were 2,569 or 23.45%. This merchandise is like a marathoner that starts sprinting just when you think after running for days on straight it should drop dead. Or its like that guy that cracks open a new bottle of Smirnoff at 3am just when you think the celebrate is over. I used to be a real estate salesman and I can express you late Nov. but especially the first 2 weeks in Dec is the best time of year to buy. Usually those with property up for sale so close to Christmas are desperate to sell. The closer to Christmas the exceed. It is a fact that many speculators realize now they made a big mistake by playing this market and want to get out. The champagne-popping days are over. Despite all the brouhaha about a hot RE market it is clear very little is moving (drink 13% from same Q last year) prices are slipping and poised for a major correction or maybe an outright crash. It is quite normal for sellers to stubbornly cling to their high prices not wanting to budge but there is a way to make them face free market forces. Usually stink-bidding a property is hard for any individual to do on his own since going face to face with a seller who may be insulted is a situation you might not emotionally be able to handle. This is why you should employ an agent and let him do the work for you. Your agent is obligated to take ALL offers to the vendor. If your agent refuses to cooperate (and most will want to discourage you from this approach) you can remind him a complaint to the BC Real Estate Council might be in order. Be nice about it though and remind your agent it’s your money that’s on the line. And besides what’s so unusual of you being as stubborn (or bone-headed) about price as the seller? This approach is best for people who are just “sitting on the fence” not really needing to get into the market but at this point in the RE cycle it’s good strategy. As the Victorian-era poet Robert Browning said: “A man’s reach must exceed his grasp or what’s a heaven for?” Concerto “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown Park and Spectrum are huge small box developments that will cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that happen ?”Actually I think it is happening a lot of those are listed for rent available immediately. I would imagine most purchasers decided that they would sell at peak season (spring) rent until then. How being unable to rent for 4 to 6 months is going to alter their staying power should be interesting. I suspect we’ll see a flod of listings in February as they decide to try to have an early prime season suffering from 100% subsidy thru the pass season. What I see is exactly what I expected a dead winter toughen with all the new owners expecting to reap a 15% wind fall come spring! Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should give Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they become forever priced out of the market. I would like to know… All I can think of is wet and soggy… leaky and those are old news… Please instruct us all with your wisdom beyond your years…. BTW if your in your 20’s… you should sit down and listen to folks that know better Hi. I rarely post here but am always watching. I have a request. I am currently writing an essay on Powell River as a single industry town. I am focussing on its growth as a retirement community. I need figures for the add up price of a single family home for each year for the last ten years. I have tried searching but nothing comes up. Could anyone back up? Thanks “Year or so ago comment was “Yaletown Park and Spectrum are huge small box developments that ordain cause oversupply upon completion”. “prices will drop” etc etc. Is it just me or did nothing like that come about ?” The Yaletown Park completions were a big topic of the past. The bears claimed this would be the turning point in the market. They were talking about in 2004 and 2005. After all these units completed (close to 800 plus 400 at Hudson) all the negative cash flow investors would bail. Or if they tried to rent them out it would flood the rental market and cause rents to drop. Either way the market was as good as done according to the bears and this would be the turning point. We heard similar things about Spectrum later on from others. So what happened? Yaletown Park was completed in Spring 2006. We saw very few units come up for sale (about 10%). The units that were for sale were snapped up alter away. The units that were rented out were rented for record rents. All the people who bought at the presales were cash flow positive. And as we all know the market continued it’s upward trend. Now we undergo Spectrum completing. Again rents have continued to rise and the Spectrum investors are again cash flow positive. Spectrum IMO is one of the worst DT locations stuck on an island between the viaducts and GM place on top of the only big box hold on in the core. comfort they seem to be getting decent rents for the units. I guess the bears will have to pick a new big project or event to focus on as the “turning inform”. Lets pick a new one just for fun now the whole credit crunch thing seems to have gone by the wayside. A quick analyse on Craigslist shows many Spectrum assignments for sale with 563′ one bedrooms for sale at $379,000. Craigslist also shows many of these same units offered for rent at $1,250 per month. Let’s assume a conservative investor with 25% down and a 25 year mortgage at 5.75%. Mortgage payments alone are $1,776 per month with little of that going to principal in the first couple of years. Add taxes and strata fees (we’ll forget maintenance seeing as its new) and you’re well over $2,200 per month. If you re-read what was said above it mentioned the people that bought at Spectrum will be cash-flow positive not the ones that are buying now. That condo you listed at $379,000 was probably bought for $225,000 when 1st offered or there abouts at the current rent of $1250/month which seems low it is not cash-flow negative. With rents going up a conservative 3% a year within a couple of years that investment will be paying a healthy divendend. First will current selling prices at $379,000 an original acquire price of $225,000 would be 68.44% appreciation. Nothing’s impossible I speculate but this seems more than a bit of a stretch. Even if we assume a $225,000 purchase price however the owe payment using the same parameters in my original post would be $1,054 per month. Add strata fees and taxes and you are still not cash flow positive at $1,250 per month in rent. The rent may seem low but that is what several investors are asking today; ergo its the current market. “Therefore. (dog #1 through dog #7) should give Newsflash and Rob a call and beg them to find a good investment property before they become forever priced out of the market” no need to be afraid of being priced out of the market because the RE chihuahua dogs are already well planned in the market; thank you for your concern by the way. How about you? still feeling lonely and sour of the market? Better to make that “spycho” counselling very soon!Just a prediction on Nov: The second best on Record! “How being unable to rent for 4 to 6 months is going to alter their staying cater should be interesting.” Some people rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that will purport to rent furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t know how successful they are. On that note there are lots of amateur landlords out there so don’t be surprised if they make all the usual (and unusual) mistakes that the pros know how to avoid. change surface if the market stays strong there ordain be investors that ordain get burned. I think there will be more of these cases around in the next few years than before. I guessed at the $225K figure as I don’t know what the 1bds went for. I do know the 2brs at Specturm were offered at $299K hence the guess at $225 shouldn’t be too far off. Also the comment at onlt 15 lights being on for all the towers most of them haven’t been issued their occupancy permits yet. Again just playing devils advocate here. Jesse;”Some populate rent out furnished units on a monthly basis (hotel style) so they can stage for sale quickly. There are agencies that ordain purport to rent furnished units out for you for a fee. Better than nothing craigslist has a few of these but I don’t know how successful they are.” Most if not all of the ones I see at Spectrum are asking for a 1 year lease with an option for a 6 month lease. Owner know one month vacancy is 10% less rent for the year. Spectrum doesn’t appear to be in the furnished hotel dwell syndrome. However a great site to see those kind of rentals is which I have watched for the past three months. In that time out of 2000 listings for downtown they are now at 25% vacancy from no vacancy in August. Absolutely nothing has moved. There incredibly high rents appear to have to pay the entire return for the owner in the summer four months. If you work the math these are also losing for their investors. (Multiply the rent x 12 and 1/3 of that is the annual return)! As a side note Spectrum 3 and 4 are just starting move ins this week so look at the lights in December for a exceed idea. I’d probably look at Jan-Feb for the “lights on” test as one lighten lit is another extinguished — there is typically overlap especially with initial occupancy where the occupancy date can slip and one needs to keep renting until the move-in date is guaranteed. “flipper city! low end kitchens godawful hall carpets only 2 elevators per bldg.” Agreed I was thru 3 and 4 a while back on business. Basically low end spec quality lousy location. Try two treadmills for 900+ residents! Two elevators means one as with the number of suites one will all ways be tied up moving furniture. Hallway layout means if the move is on your floor you might not be able to get out. True price should be around $125,000.00 for a 1 bedroom which is what it will be in two years! British Columbia’s economy created over 55,800 new jobs in the past 12 months to October 2007. Of those. 48,600 or 87% were full-time. Sustained strong growth of employment has also contributed to a steady net influx of people from other provinces and from outside the country. At 4.4%. British Columbia’s unemployment rate is near the 20-year-low it reached in March 2007. Brian this is not news this is industry propaganda. Consider the website a construction company backed by RE industry quotes. “Finally despite the weakness in the U. S.. China’s insatiable appetite for British Columbia’s resources should mean that the province’s net exports will continue to contribute to growth in the future.” This is complete rubbish. China does not undergo an ‘insatiable appetite’ for BC exports. Reed construction could not have possibly verified this. As I posted last week. BC only exports what was it. 4.5% to China. I evaluate it was $1.5 billion. Further it mentions 13 000 jobs created in construction out of 55 000 jobs over the last year were in construction alone. If this is correct almost a quarter of all new jobs are in construction. Sounds like California a bring together of years ago. A lot of Canadian banks have taken some write-off with regards to their subprime exposure. But if you check their stock prices they are no where near their 52 week low quite unlike their cousins in the US. Bank of montreal trades up today. FYI. That speaks truth about the amount of subprime exposure for the canadian banks and also explains the continued boom in the canadian real estate merchandise. “Economic uncertainty in the U. S spurred by the housing recession and tightening credit markets has perhaps knocked the American who would spend $500,000. Kelly said. Americans playing in the $1-million-plus market are still interested in Whistler but proceeding with a bit more care he added. “They definitely have to have something before the Olympics whether it’s rental or purchase,” Kelly said. “Americans are big Olympic boosters they always have been and they want to be part of [the 2010 Games].” ” Yes. Americans are big Olympic boosters. But how many are going to buy just because of the Olympics. These $1 Million plus players didn’t get rich buying on hype. I remember lots of people saying Americans were buying places en masse a couple of years ago. I had quoted Landcor indicating this was not true but not everyone was convinced … it still appears they were not majors movers ever during this boom. Landcor didn’t even mentioned non-resident Iranians and Chinese since there purchases in BC were not significant. Lots of others thought there was proxy buying and that their purchasing was/is rampant. Maybe if one had lots of exposure to one market desire Coal shelter this might seem true but I dont’ know since there is no data showing this. TORONTO. March 2 (Reuters) - Royal Bank of Canada (RY. TO: Quote. compose. Research) posted a 27.6 percent rise in its first-quarter profit on Friday as a result of strong earnings across all of its business divisions particularly in its U. S segment. Canada’s biggest bank said it earned C$1.49 billion or C$1.14 a share for the three months ending Jan. 31. VANCOUVER. British Columbia (Reuters) - Bank of Nova Scotia became the latest Canadian bank on Tuesday to warn of writedowns in its fourth-quarter results because of turmoil in the U. S subprime mortgage merchandise. Scotiabank. Canada’s second-biggest bank said it will lop C$135 million ($141 million) after tax off the value of its nonbank asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) and structured credit investments. The portion of Canada’s ABCP market that is not run by the country’s big banks ground to a halt this summer when buyers dried up on fears the debt investments were exposed to the U. S subprime market. Companies holding the paper as investments have been cutting up to 15 percent off its value. Scotiabank’s announcement came several hours after Royal Bank of Canada said it will take a C$160-million after-tax rush in the same quarter for investments tied to the subprime market where some analysts expect at least one in every four risky home loans could go into default. We probably haven’t seen the full extent of the write-downs but if my math is right (someone please check it) RB made a Q1 profit about 9 times bigger than the write down. Does that alter the write-down big or small? I’ll let you decide and add only that I wouldn’t call the write drink insignificant and smaller losses in one area of a profitable balance sheet have probably hammered other stock values even more. Aside from it looking scary and moving fast (sorry. Priced Out but what’s new about that?) can anyone hammer some numbers into perspective? (Side note: I read today a forecast for 4 rate cuts from BoC. bequeath what I said about the CBs thinking they can manage inflation coco? I know time ordain express but I see increasing liquidity on the horizon). If banks could manage subprime writedowns why would they raise mortgage rates in October due to the credit crunch and offer less off a discount off the posted owe rates more recently? I guess they want to maintain high profits and please the shareholders after all? The consumer will pay for banks bad investments whether that is in the form of higher ascribe card interest rates higher mortgage rates less of a discount off posted mortgage rates higher bank fees borrowing restrictions etc. etc. That said are you really seeing significant moves in mortgage rates? My latest rate pelt has everything from 1-5 years in a narrow band: 5.55% to 5.94%. Compare that to Feb this year:1 yr = 5.2%2 yr = 5.25%3 yr = 5.3%4 yr = 5.3%5 yr = 5.19% and September of ‘06:1 yr = 5.1% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.25% August 23rd)2 yr = 5.2% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)3 yr = 5.3% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.3% August 23rd)4 yr = 5.35% (unchanged from September 14 was 5.4% August 23rd)5 yr = 5.28% (was 5.3% September 14 and 5.35% August 23rd) Can’t find it online at the FP but in the paper itself. FP2. Best of the FP Netwoork you’ll find Ted Carmicheal. JP Morgan Chase Canada’s chief economist making the call. You guessed it: he is styled one of the most bearish forecasters on Bay Street. He thinks 4 cuts of 25 basis points apiece will not undercut attempts to keep core inflation in the 2% range. In other news PMI Mortgage Insurance was approved Thursday for the lucrative insured mortgage arena. CMHC a enthrone corporation has long dominated the sector with about 70% market overlap. They’ve been giving up ground (not too hard to do when you start from a monopoly position and then have to compete) to Genworth and AIG. Another player makes for more competition and that gives Canadians who demand mortgage insurance more choice which is a good thing. While it reduces CMHC’s access toe asy money it should also calm those who fear that the Canadian taxpayer is underwriting bad loans through CMHC. Who can really argue against privatizing bad loans? XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <touch> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://rireb.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/quick-wednesday-thursday-and-friday-numbers/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the over 90 archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
27 articles in 2006-03
36 articles in 2006-04
27 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
22 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
7 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
10 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


over 90